I am of the opinion that the stock market still has some legs in this rally. As you can see in the chart below looking at month end numbers for the S&P, you can see a very similar co-movement between the current cycle (“the Great Recovery”) and the mid-70s bear market (“Oil Crisis”).

Note: “Great Recovery” till April 12, 2010, using monthly numbers. The Oil Crisis is from December 1974 – December 1976.
Clearly at Covert Analytics we espouse a cross asset class, global approach to investing. In other words the decision to invest in stocks is not only based on how risky the US market is, but also, how risky is it compared to other markets, how risky is it compared to bonds, etc. Clearly at this point in the cycle, with the S&P up over 70% (factoring in daily prices), it is hard to have an “all-in” approach to stocks. But I am still very optimistic at this point of the cycle, regardless of how much little upside is displayed by historical comparisons like mine above.
I do not think the market is likely to reverse direction. Clearly the tendency after a deep downturn has been to underestimate the efficacy of economic and monetary policy as well as the resilience of the business sector. It is very in vogue these days to speak of the new normal and how this means boring corporate profitability and a market with limited upside. What if everyone is wrong? What if we are facing a stronger than expected stock market environment?
If you look at historical stock market cycles, the average cyclical bear market has been followed by at least two years of positive returns. Of course we acknowledge that 2009 was a strong recovery year, and there are many risks out there. However, lets look at some market indicators to see how they are pricing in the recovery.
- Dr Copper / Oil are up sharply. Crude is only a couple percentage points away from its 52 week high, and Copper is signalling a very strong demand for the commodity.
- Yield curve is still very steep. Strongly positive sloping yield curves (steep) imply an upcoming economic recovery. The difference between the 10 year and 3 mo money market yields across the G7 are very high (353 bps in the US, 344 bps in the UK, 260 bps in Euro-zone, 327 bps in Canada, 322 bps in New Zealand, etc).
- Still low interest rates. Recent studies by Siegel have implied that low risk free rates encourage risk taking and thus higher multiples of earnings.
- Accomodative monetary policy. Federal Reserve bank is sitting tight at current levels, and so is the ECB / BoE / BoJ, etc. Only select commodity currency countries are in hiking mode (Australia).
- Junk spreads continue to compress. Single B spreads were 629 bps as of December 2009 and have compressed to 598 bps.
I guess our conclusion is the following, as long as short rates stay at zero, there is a high propensity for economic growth to accelerate, and for the stock market rally to continue.
Sincerely,
The Covert Analytics Team




Cheap money does not cure all debt ills
Monday, November 30th, 2009The market reaction to Dubai last week seems emotionally driven and an exaggeration given the size of the problem. Concerns regarding a second round of the financial crisis due to Dubai should not be taken too seriously. Lehman for example had nearly $1 trillion in debt in its books when it collapsed.
Dubai has requested a “standstill agreement”, a likely precursor for a hoped-for debt restructuring. For weeks newspaper articles have been talking about the $80 billion debt overhang and Dubai’s inability to pay its debt that was coming due. The implied guarantee by Abu Dhabi is being tested and the lack of any support last week was surprising. This weekend’s actions by UAE fueled the reflex rally today in Asia (Hang Seng was up 3.3%, Australia was up 2.8%, even the sleepy Topix was up 3.6%). Good summary article from the FT about the UAE’s actions, but long story short the central bank is setting up an emergency liquidity facility (sound familiar?) to provide banks with fresh liquidity to offset fleeing capital after the shock of Nakheel (the real estate arm of Dubai World). Sadly this sounds too familiar, given the real estate bubble in Dubai, and the over-reliance on construction and real estate as a driver of their economy.
Pressure will definitely mount to not allow Dubai to default. The United Arab Emirates is comprised of seven emirates, the largest and richest of which is Abu Dhabi, the “senior partner” in the group, controlling 90% of UAE’s vast oil reserves. Not to mention that Abu Dhabi has the largest sovereign wealth fund at a little over $650 billion. It seems that Dubai’s problems can be solved by a check from its bigger brother, even though the bigger brother claims a blank check is not going to happen. There has clearly been a global central bank push to lower rates, which has encouraged a massive refinance wave to extend maturities. I agree that sufficient debt write downs are lacking, and the Dubai news highlights that cheap money does not cure all debt ills.
In conclusion, I don’t think this Nakheel issue poses a serious threat to derail the market rally. However it is evident how “spooked” the market can get (Shanghai A shares were down 7% last week), a sign that many market participants are skittish. As John Mauldin put it recently: “when anything as relative small as Dubai spooks the market, it should serve as a warning sign.”
Article from the Financial Times:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e9334100-dca8-11de-ad60-00144feabdc0.html
Tags: Dubai, investment strategy, market commentary, Nakheel
Posted in Market Talk, Monetary Policy | No Comments »